Rubens Eve |
Most people do not think logically and sequentially; hence the term Sequential Logic. Something that happened before the sequence of events is not always true to one, while it is true to another. One mind studies a story, which contains a complete chain of events; while another is in the story. Unlike the reader those in the story deal only with the individual timeframes. Their experiences are solely theirs, we the observers and readers, can only glean some information from their actual experiences and interpret them. Those that were supernaturally healed of cancer, for example, know how they felt when they were sick and how they felt when God's force of life entered his or her body. Whether one believes in divine healing today, or not, is completely irrelevant in this case. Personal experiences of other people have to be taken at their face value and never (subjectively) interpreted. Rejoice with those who rejoice, dance with those that dance and mourn with those who mourn, that's the attitude, not dogmatic or contentious, philosophical or theological.
In the case of Adam and Eve the same applies. Each timeframe was an event, which they had dealt with, and at that time they were blind to any later subsequent events. Based on this logic one cannot conclude something to be completely true because one interprets these events subjectively within one's own timeframe. Try to explain something to someone about electricity and computers who is scribbling words with ink and feather pen; on a parchment using candle for light. Those two timeframes do not fit and therefore these two individuals are in two different worlds.
[Matthew 11:16-19] “But to what shall I compare this generation? It is like children sitting in the market places, who call out to the other children, 17and say, ‘We played the flute for you, and you did not dance; we sang a dirge, and you did not mourn.’ 18“For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, ‘He has a demon!’ 19“The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and they say, ‘Behold, a gluttonous man and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!’ Yet wisdom is vindicated by her deeds.”
In the case of Adam and Eve the same applies. Each timeframe was an event, which they had dealt with, and at that time they were blind to any later subsequent events. Based on this logic one cannot conclude something to be completely true because one interprets these events subjectively within one's own timeframe. Try to explain something to someone about electricity and computers who is scribbling words with ink and feather pen; on a parchment using candle for light. Those two timeframes do not fit and therefore these two individuals are in two different worlds.
For example: before Eve could even reach for the tree's fruit she had to have a desire, which was not present in her until Nechash created it in her. Adam did not eat the fruit immediately after it was picked off the tree; there was some time between the fruit in Eve's hand and then in Adam's mouth.
Points if interest
- Man was to rule and subdue the earth. Lost Garden of Eden was not lost.
- There was no desire for neither tree. The "Yes" and "No" was not felt yet.
- Choices are only possible within a realm of opposites.
1. Nechash was only sent to create a desire for one tree, Etz Da'at. (Knowledge Tree).
2. Through Etz Da'at comes the distinction and choice.
3. Before Nechash and Etz Da'at there was only bliss (for our mind today, which for Adam and Eve was neither good or bad, nice, pleasant or unpleasant) because of the above points 1 and 2.
4. After the fruit was eaten their eyes were THEN opened, which means that their eyes were closed before (Hebraic thinking of the opposites, non-Hebrew people avoid negatives; being quite hesitant to deal with it. The Hebrew people use RATZON the rational mind, which is quite different from the soul's emotional sphere, which uses minus and plus opposites. Either, the soul sends signals to the mind or the mind first sends signals to the soul as to how it should feel.
To not see means to not understand or grasp, and if so then no choice will follow. So they understood, and only with this ability of cognizance, or understanding, they could choose.
To not see means to not understand or grasp, and if so then no choice will follow. So they understood, and only with this ability of cognizance, or understanding, they could choose.
5. Genesis 3 paints a picture of consequences and portrays good and bed emotions; having an unpleasant feeling makes one choose something more pleasant. That's just the basics. Obedience and disobedience and their consequences are being experienced, which is the actual eye-opening, seeing and grasping. They saw this cattle (creature Nechash) becoming a symbol of ARROR (Hebrew bitterness), curse, but also a symbol of healing, depending on how one perceives it and uses his or her mind.
The turning flaming swords outside the Garden of Eden had something to do with the two-edged sword mentioned in the Book of Hebrews 4:12, which pierces and separates the spiritual things from carnal or even soul's things. This sword is the Sword of Truth (Ephesians 6) minus and plus, darkness and light, curse or blessing, death or life...
The turning flaming swords outside the Garden of Eden had something to do with the two-edged sword mentioned in the Book of Hebrews 4:12, which pierces and separates the spiritual things from carnal or even soul's things. This sword is the Sword of Truth (Ephesians 6) minus and plus, darkness and light, curse or blessing, death or life...
Moses lifted up the serpent and Jesus compared Himself to the lifted-up serpent. Just as people were healed of the snake venoms; people are also healed when they look upon Jesus.
6. The driving out of Adam and Eve out of the Garden of Eden was not permanent, but it was in God's plan, for He told them to replenish the earth (with their kind), and to rule over the entire planet. They - being the (new) seed of God (in the midst of something old) or having the extra-dimensional life properties - had to deal with opposites; hence, morality, wrongs and rights. Later, Cain chose to be the tare having God's life in him. Also the good seed which manifested itself in Enoch, Seth, Enosh, Noah, Abraham … Jesus (the source) also manifests itself today in us. Thus Enoch returned to Paradise without tasting death; most likely Apostle John also.
Only the seed and the tares possess life, but not the field. The field is actually dead; hence very much neutral. A tare produced bad fruits and the good seed is being harvested and stored in a barn; used for food, wealth and for another sowing and harvest.
(A) Scripture: [Matthew 7:16-20] “You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? 17“So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. 18“A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. 19“Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20“So then, you will know them by their fruits.
(B) Scripture: [Matthew 13:30] ‘Allow both to grow together until the harvest; and in the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers, “First gather up the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them up; but gather the wheat into my barn."'
(C) Scripture: [Verse 38] the field is the world; and as for the good seed, these are the sons of the kingdom; and the tares are the evil sons.
7. Today, through "Tov" (good) and "Rah" (Bad or evil) (TORAH) we learn how to handle good and bad and then choose; blessings or curses, life or death, (Deuteronomy 30:19).
8. We have a new start in our personal life with Jesus, who paid the price for this knowledge to blossom like a flower and He further educates us through the Holy Spirit today. He introduces us to the Etz Hei'em (Tree of Life), which He Himself is,
“Truly, truly, I say to you, if anyone keeps My word he will never see death” (John 8:51).
0 comments:
Post a Comment